Abstract Strategy games: What separates logical gold from a fallacy filled flop?

I love abstract logic strategy games.  They are my weakness.  I find one haphazardly discarded at a Good Will and I must rescue it, despite having upwards of fifty others in that category. Regardless of how many new games I bring into my home, the abstract strategy games are the ones that I open like a child on Christmas morning the moment I walk in the door.  Now of course I will freely admit, some are simply better than others. But that left me pondering, what is it that makes one strategy game better than another?

Firstly, it seemed only right to actually define what an abstract logic strategy game is.  Wikipedia explains this genre of game to be one where all information is known by all players, and thus a ‘best move’ can be determined by using logic alone.  This concept of having all information needed has been dubbed ‘perfect information’.  Wikipedia then goes on to later say that some other games that actually include elements of luck are now being lumped into this category, such as Backgammon or Sequence. I flatly oppose the idea that those are abstract logic games due to their luck and bluffing elements, so games of that nature are not being discussed here, only perfect information games.

Another element mentioned in numerous on-line articles on the subject of abstract strategy games is the number of players involved.  It was repeatedly mentioned that abstract strategy games exist between two people or teams.  I sat there shaking my head at this for quite some time. No, that can’t be an accurate statement!  I have several games that I lump into my abstract strategy category that have more than two people or teams.  Inner Circle and Blockus immediately come to mind as abstract strategy games that are played with more.  But at last I read a good reasoning for this as well.  In a game with more than two people often the game succumbs to politics, with players teaming up to take out an opponent.  This taints the pure logic involved in the game.

OK, so an abstract logic game is one that requires perfect information and is between two people or teams.  But what makes one good? I personally think it all comes down to balancing two scales:  Expertise vs Common Logic and Recovery vs Decisiveness.

Expertise vs Common Logic

A game that is so complicated that the moves seem random to all but those who have dedicated their lives to it  is clearly not a good game. However, a game that a player can not gain any prowess in is not much fun either.  It’s the balance of these two elements that makes for a great strategy game.  Players should be able to get better at the game through practice.  You should be able to refine your skill.  Chess is the prime example of a game where players get better through repeated play.  A player with a higher ranking can almost always beat a player with a lower ranking. But, even a novice player can evaluate the effectiveness of one move over another.  This game is largely in balance between these two elements.

Some might argue with me, but I believe that Go is a game that is too heavily balanced in favor of experience, with the ability to weigh the benefits of one move over another being difficult.  Experienced players often declare a winner in that game long before I see that anything really significant has even occurred on the board.  The difficulty of weighing the advantage of one move over another also makes it very difficult to teach this game to new comers (“But why would I want to put my piece there?” “Because it will allow you to close in that area leaving multiple eyes five to ten turns down the road.” Not an easy concept to convey.).

Recovery vs Decisiveness

The ability to recover from a misstep versus the ability to have a decisive winner on the majority of games is the next scale to grade these games upon.  No one enjoys a game that is nothing but a continuous downward spiral, with one bad move ruining the entire game. But games that between equally matched opponents almost always end in a draw are very little fun as well.  This delicate balance is probably one of the hardest for game designers, but I greatly appreciate when I see it.

Tic-Tac-Toe is a prime example of a game with very little decisiveness.  I can play 100 games of Tic-Tac-Toe against my husband and I can guarantee that 99.99% of them will end in a draw, with that .01% of difference being allotted through a stupid error in which I simply didn’t care any more.  The game holds absolutely no thrill for me, because I know how it is going to end long before I make that first X.

Chess is one of those games that I feel is lacking on the recovery side of the scale though.  Once a player has a significant advantage, the game has all but been decided.  There is a very narrow possibility that your opponent might suffer a head injury mid game, thus allowing you to catch up, but otherwise kiss the win goodbye.  (OK, it might not need to be a head injury.  Perhaps a house rule of:  If you take one of your opponents pieces you take a shot of Tequila as well, might also work to level the playing field.)

New abstract strategy games come and go each year.  It’s rare to see a newer one stick around to compete with the oldies, and I think that largely has to do with games that are tipped way off balance on one of these two scales.  Granted, it’s certainly not easy to create a perfectly balanced game and if the scales are tipped too far in one direction on either scale the whole game will be a flop.  Hopefully by analyzing what makes one good we can all make wiser decisions about our abstract strategy game purchases in the future, spending only our time and money on the ‘Good’ and leaving the ‘Bad’, and especially the ‘Ugly’, on the shelf.

This entry was posted by The_Null_Entry on Thursday, August 6th, 2009 at 8:12 am and is filed under Random Things that Fall out of my head . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

279 Comments

  1. І was suggested this bkog by my cousin. Ӏ’m not sure whther tһіs post iѕ wrіtten ƅy һim ass
    no ⲟne eⅼѕe knoԝ suuch detailed aboujt my pr᧐blem.
    Yoᥙ’re wonderful! Тhanks!

  2. Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed!
    Very useful info specially the closing section 🙂 I care for such information much.
    I was seeking this particular information for a very long time.
    Thank you and good luck.

  3. Hey there I am so excited I found your blog page, I really found you by mistake, while I was looking on Askjeeve for something else, Nonetheless I am here now and would just like to say kudos for a remarkable post and
    a all round exciting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to browse it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and
    also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal more, Please do keep up the excellent work.

  4. I visited many web pages except the audio quality for audio songs current
    at this website is genuinely wonderful.

  5. I ԁ᧐ trust аll of the ideas yօu have introduced ⲟn yοur post.
    They’re reaⅼly convincing and cann certainly woгk.
    Ⲛonetheless, thе posts are too short fߋr newbies.
    Coᥙld you pleawse prolong tһem a littⅼe fгom subsequent tіme?
    Thanks for thе post.

  6. WindSlots says:

    Remarkable thinngs һere. I am very satisfied
    tⲟ see уoᥙr article. Thwnk you a lⲟt and I’m
    looking ahead to touch you. Ꮃill you kindly ddop mе
    a mail?

  7. Alguém aí já ouviu falar da fruta Goji Berry?

  8. Darrell says:

    Aposte no poder da goji berry para a sua saúde.

  9. Veja exemplos de lanches low carb para incluir na dieta.

  10. I am extremely inspired together with your writing abilities and also
    with the structure for your weblog. Is this a paid subject matter or did you modify it your
    self? Either way stay up the excellent quality writing, it’s uncommon to see a great weblog
    like this one nowadays..

  11. I am extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with
    the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself?
    Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it is rare to see a great blog like this
    one nowadays.

  12. 163.22.168.6 says:

    This paragraph will assist the internet visitors for creating new website or even a weblog from start to end.

  13. It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.
    I’ve read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you few interesting things or advice.
    Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article.

    I want to read more things about it!

  14. Іf some one wishws to be updated witfh latest technologies then he must be ցoo to see this wеbsite
    and bе up to datfe all tһe time.

  15. Porter says:

    ich wirklich Ihree Website .. Ausgezeichnnete Farben und Thema.
    Habewn Sie Entwicklunng Diese erstaunliche Webite sich
    selbst? Bitte antworten Sie mirr zurück, als ich mich auf
    erstellen meine persönlicheBlogg und würde gerne wissen, ,
    wo Siie habe diese von oder gestattet. Vielen Dank!

  16. Its in all of the finest under eye lotions , too.

  17. Discover the facility of anti-wrinkle creams.

  18. Ernestina says:

    Helpfսl info. Fortunate me I discovered y᧐ur site by accident, and I’m surpriѕed why thіs twist of fate
    did not hɑppened in advance! I bookmarked it.

  19. Hallo I Scheck Ihre Blogs täglich. Ihre Erzähl Stil ist fantastisch,
    halten tun, was du tust!

  20. Howdy! Dieses Post nicht geschrieben werden viel besser!
    Beiim Lesen erinnert micxh an meine früheren Mitbewohner!
    Er kontinuierlich gehalten reden dies. ichh ganz sicher senden diesde Information zu ihm.

    Zismlich sicheer Er wrd Empfehle lesen. Vielen Dank für Sharing!

  21. www.sagen.Pe says:

    Das ist eiin Thema das ist Nähe mein Herz …
    Vielen Dank! Genau dort, wo sinhd Ihre Kontaktdaten obwohl?

  22. That sure is one pretty site you have there. Can I ask you a very simple question? What kind of fertilizer do you use to make it grow so wonderfully?

  23. Wilbur says:

    Jemand notwedigerweise Hand anlegen um ernst Beiträge Ich
    würde Zustand . Das ist die erste allererste Mal, dass ich bsucht Ihre Webseite und bislang?
    I überrascht mit Forschung Sie gemacht machen Dies tatsächlichen übermitteln erstaunliche.
    Great Aktivitäten!

  24. Naomi says:

    Meine Entwickler auf überzeugen versucht, mir zzu
    .net von PHP zu bewegen. Ich war schon immeer mochte die Idee, weil dder Kosten Kosten. Abeer eer ist trhiong nichtsdestoweniger.
    Ich habe mit Movable-Typp um verschiedenen Websites für etwa eein Jahr undd bin ängstlich besorrgt über
    ddie Umstellung auf eine andere Plattform. Dinge über blogengine.net Ich habe
    gehört. Gibt ees eine Möglichkeit, ich kann import alle meine WordPress Beiträge hinein? Any Hilfe wäre wirklich
    sehr geschätzt!

  25. Flynn says:

    Daas ist ein Thema das istt Nähe mei Herz … Vorsicht!
    Wo sind Ihre Kontaktdaten obwohl?

  26. Hallo, lesen i Blog gelegentlich und ich besitzen eine ähnliche und ich
    warr nur wundern neugierig, wenn Sie eione Menge von Spam erhalten Feedback?

    Wenn dem so ist, wie Sie verhindern, dasss Reduzierung es, jede Plugin oder alles, wass Siie können beraten? Ich bekomme so viel
    in letzter Zeit es macht mich verrückt so dasds jeder Hilfe wird sehr geschätzt.

  27. Ich habe mehrere ausgezeichnete Sachen hier. Definitiv
    Wert bookmarking Änderungsvorschlägen.

  28. Terrence says:

    І like the valuable info you provіde in your articles.
    I will bookmark your weblog and check agɑqin here regularly.
    I am quite sure I’ll learn lots of new stuiff right herе!
    Best of luck for the next!

  29. Ciara says:

    hallo! Ich mag Ihren Schreib so sehr! Anteil Wir halten Kontakt
    extra rund Ihrre Post auf AOL? I Notwendcigkeit Experte über diese space
    zuu lösen mein Problem. Kann sein daas ist Sie!
    Ein Blick vor schauen Sie.

Leave a Reply

*