Abstract Strategy games: What separates logical gold from a fallacy filled flop?

I love abstract logic strategy games.  They are my weakness.  I find one haphazardly discarded at a Good Will and I must rescue it, despite having upwards of fifty others in that category. Regardless of how many new games I bring into my home, the abstract strategy games are the ones that I open like a child on Christmas morning the moment I walk in the door.  Now of course I will freely admit, some are simply better than others. But that left me pondering, what is it that makes one strategy game better than another?

Firstly, it seemed only right to actually define what an abstract logic strategy game is.  Wikipedia explains this genre of game to be one where all information is known by all players, and thus a ‘best move’ can be determined by using logic alone.  This concept of having all information needed has been dubbed ‘perfect information’.  Wikipedia then goes on to later say that some other games that actually include elements of luck are now being lumped into this category, such as Backgammon or Sequence. I flatly oppose the idea that those are abstract logic games due to their luck and bluffing elements, so games of that nature are not being discussed here, only perfect information games.

Another element mentioned in numerous on-line articles on the subject of abstract strategy games is the number of players involved.  It was repeatedly mentioned that abstract strategy games exist between two people or teams.  I sat there shaking my head at this for quite some time. No, that can’t be an accurate statement!  I have several games that I lump into my abstract strategy category that have more than two people or teams.  Inner Circle and Blockus immediately come to mind as abstract strategy games that are played with more.  But at last I read a good reasoning for this as well.  In a game with more than two people often the game succumbs to politics, with players teaming up to take out an opponent.  This taints the pure logic involved in the game.

OK, so an abstract logic game is one that requires perfect information and is between two people or teams.  But what makes one good? I personally think it all comes down to balancing two scales:  Expertise vs Common Logic and Recovery vs Decisiveness.

Expertise vs Common Logic

A game that is so complicated that the moves seem random to all but those who have dedicated their lives to it  is clearly not a good game. However, a game that a player can not gain any prowess in is not much fun either.  It’s the balance of these two elements that makes for a great strategy game.  Players should be able to get better at the game through practice.  You should be able to refine your skill.  Chess is the prime example of a game where players get better through repeated play.  A player with a higher ranking can almost always beat a player with a lower ranking. But, even a novice player can evaluate the effectiveness of one move over another.  This game is largely in balance between these two elements.

Some might argue with me, but I believe that Go is a game that is too heavily balanced in favor of experience, with the ability to weigh the benefits of one move over another being difficult.  Experienced players often declare a winner in that game long before I see that anything really significant has even occurred on the board.  The difficulty of weighing the advantage of one move over another also makes it very difficult to teach this game to new comers (“But why would I want to put my piece there?” “Because it will allow you to close in that area leaving multiple eyes five to ten turns down the road.” Not an easy concept to convey.).

Recovery vs Decisiveness

The ability to recover from a misstep versus the ability to have a decisive winner on the majority of games is the next scale to grade these games upon.  No one enjoys a game that is nothing but a continuous downward spiral, with one bad move ruining the entire game. But games that between equally matched opponents almost always end in a draw are very little fun as well.  This delicate balance is probably one of the hardest for game designers, but I greatly appreciate when I see it.

Tic-Tac-Toe is a prime example of a game with very little decisiveness.  I can play 100 games of Tic-Tac-Toe against my husband and I can guarantee that 99.99% of them will end in a draw, with that .01% of difference being allotted through a stupid error in which I simply didn’t care any more.  The game holds absolutely no thrill for me, because I know how it is going to end long before I make that first X.

Chess is one of those games that I feel is lacking on the recovery side of the scale though.  Once a player has a significant advantage, the game has all but been decided.  There is a very narrow possibility that your opponent might suffer a head injury mid game, thus allowing you to catch up, but otherwise kiss the win goodbye.  (OK, it might not need to be a head injury.  Perhaps a house rule of:  If you take one of your opponents pieces you take a shot of Tequila as well, might also work to level the playing field.)

New abstract strategy games come and go each year.  It’s rare to see a newer one stick around to compete with the oldies, and I think that largely has to do with games that are tipped way off balance on one of these two scales.  Granted, it’s certainly not easy to create a perfectly balanced game and if the scales are tipped too far in one direction on either scale the whole game will be a flop.  Hopefully by analyzing what makes one good we can all make wiser decisions about our abstract strategy game purchases in the future, spending only our time and money on the ‘Good’ and leaving the ‘Bad’, and especially the ‘Ugly’, on the shelf.

This entry was posted by The_Null_Entry on Thursday, August 6th, 2009 at 8:12 am and is filed under Random Things that Fall out of my head . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

112 Comments

  1. parkrrrr says:

    Does Inner Circle really qualify as an abstract strategy game even with two players? I’m pretty sure there is some hidden information: the relative orientations of the four boards. If I’m doing the math correctly, there are 64 possible configurations of the four boards, and no matter how expert a player you are it’s impossible to determine at the beginning of the game which of 16 possible games you’re playing.

    I believe, but have not proven conclusively, that once you get to the fourth board, it becomes like Tic-Tac-Toe: there’s no point in continuing to play if both players are halfway good at the game, as the winner has already been determined at that point. Whoever is closest to the center, by a metric that is somewhat complicated but entirely unambiguous, will win.

    Let’s say that you’ve played through the first two boards and are looking for the first time at the third board (which has a fourth board underneath it, visible only – if I recall correctly – through three holes or “survival spaces.”) You can tell how many dots are on each of the fourth-board circles visible through the holes in the third board, but unless you’ve memorized the four different possible combinations of third and fourth board orientations, you don’t know which of those spaces is closest to the center. If you have memorized those four combinations, you can probably find one best strategy by which to arrange for one of your pawns to end up on the best of those three survival spaces. Unfortunately, until the second board was removed you had no idea which of those three spaces would be the best, so you didn’t have sufficient information to arrange for your pawns to be in optimal places for third-board play; it’s just as likely that your opponent has a perfect strategy by which he can occupy the best survival space.

    There may be a perfect strategy for winning this game anyway, since the amount of hidden information is so small, but there is definitely hidden information.

  2. The_Null_Entry says:

    Hmm… ya know, I never really perceived any of the survival spaces to be more advantageous then any other, although that might be entirely incorrect, and thus didn’t consider the hidden information present in this game. The fourth board is an unusual conundrum requiring several moves to get from the starting spot to the survival whole, seemingly regardless of board orientation. I wish more of the boards required the foresight needed to win the fourth board. Regardless however, it is entirely possible to best your opponent without ever getting to this board if you can eliminate their pieces early in the game.

    Inner Circle is certainly not my favorite abstract logic game, it probably wouldn’t even make the top ten (although, thats a completely different blog post!). However, if you are looking for a good one, I highly recommend Quarto. To date it is one of my favorite abstract logic games, although it can be slightly indecisive between two very skilled players. As it is though, I can usually best my husband at this one, hands down. ;-p

  3. parkrrrr says:

    I was inspired by all of this to dig out my copy of Inner Circle and actually do the math. The first thing I noticed is that I misremembered the symmetry of the boards; there are six possible relative orientations of each pair of boards, for a total of 216 possible games and 36 possibilities for each beginning configuration. The second thing I noticed is that the endgame is uglier than I thought. A more detailed writeup can be found on my own blog, here: http://parkrrrr.livejournal.com/32352.html

    My next unfounded theory is that all of the problems with the end of this game could be fixed by the simple expedient of reprinting the last board so the orientation of the dots doesn’t prematurely give away its orientation relative to the third one. It still wouldn’t be an abstract strategy game, though; we’d be hiding even more information!

    Here’s an interesting question: does Gobblet qualify as an abstract logic game in your book? If you’ve been there from the beginning of the game and you have a perfect memory, you’d have perfect information. However, since you’re human, you presumably do not actually have perfect information.

    Again trying to pull myself back onto the main topic, I’m currently reading a game design book called “Rules of Play,” and they cover the underlying meat of your point about Recovery vs. Decisiveness in the chapter on cybernetic systems (which seems to be their fancy term for what us old-school engineer types would call feedback loops.) They make the same observation: there’s a delicate balance between runaway leader syndrome and “might as well just flip a coin.”

  4. MarylandBill says:

    I am not sure I agree with your belief that Chess is a game where it is realtively easy for a novice to weigh the benefits of different moves. Unless one has studied the game, it might be difficult to understand why anyone would open with anything other than d4 or e4, and likewise, when I have played stronger players (almost any serious player), it is rarely easy for me to understand what they are doing until they are already in position to tear me apart. I will grant I am a pretty weak chess player, but your argument above was that I should be able to understand what the player was doing. On a small board, I actually find Go to be a much more straightforward game.

    As for recovering from a significant disadvantage, honestly, I think the difficulty in that is directly related how strategic a game is. If the game is easy to recover from a big disadvantage, then strategy plays relatively little role in the game since a disadvantage can be overcome through a short burst of strong tactical play.

  5. It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you few interesting things or advice. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article. I wish to read even more things about it!

  6. Fantastic beat ! I wish to apprentice at the same time as you amend your site, how could i subscribe for a blog website? The account helped me a applicable deal. I had been a little bit familiar of this your broadcast offered brilliant transparent concept

  7. home page says:

    If you desire to grow your familiarity simply keep visiting this web page and be updated with the newest information posted here.

  8. My partner and I stumbled over here coming from a different page and thought I
    should check things out. I like what I see so now
    i’m following you. Look forward to going over
    your web page again.

  9. Thank you, I’ve just been looking for information about this subject for ages and yours is
    the greatest I have discovered so far. But, what in regards to the
    conclusion? Are you certain concerning the supply?

  10. This is the right website for anyone who would like to find out about this topic.
    You know a whole lot its almost tough to argue with you (not that I actually will
    need to…HaHa). You certainly put a fresh spin on a subject
    that has been written about for years. Great stuff, just excellent!

  11. Lovie says:

    Great blog you’ve got here.. It’s hard to find quality writing like yours nowadays.
    I seriously appreciate individuals like you! Take care!!

  12. This paragraph will help the internet visitors for building up new blog
    or even a weblog from start to end.

  13. Hello! I’ve been reading your web site for some time now and finally got the courage to go
    ahead and give you a shout out from Dallas Texas!
    Just wanted to mention keep up the great job!

  14. car exhaust says:

    Hello to all, for the reason that I am really eager of reading this
    weblog’s post to be updated regularly. It contains good information.

  15. Dustin says:

    you’re really a excellent webmaster. The website loading velocity is amazing.
    It kind of feels that you are doing any unique trick.
    In addition, The contents are masterwork. you’ve performed a wonderful activity in this
    subject!

  16. Wonderful goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you are just extremely wonderful.
    I really like what you have acquired here, really
    like what you’re saying and the way in which you say it.
    You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep
    it wise. I cant wait to read far more from you. This is really a terrific website.

  17. I was curious if you ever thought of changing the structure of your blog?
    Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or
    two pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?

  18. I know this web page gives quality based articles or reviews
    and other data, is there any other site which presents these kinds of data in quality?

  19. Judith says:

    Simply wish to say your article is as amazing. The clarity in your post is simply excellent and i could assume you’re an expert on this subject.

    Well with your permission let me to grab your feed to keep updated with forthcoming
    post. Thanks a million and please carry on the enjoyable work.

  20. apple chief says:

    Good day! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site before but after browsing
    through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely happy I found
    it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back often!

  21. Toby says:

    Hello colleagues, pleasant piece of writing and pleasant urging commented at
    this place, I am actually enjoying by these.

  22. Earl says:

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts on phone detective.
    Regards

  23. This is a topic that’s close to my heart…
    Many thanks! Exactly where are your contact details though?

  24. fobesa.com says:

    My partner and I stumbled over here coming from a different website and thought I might as well check things out.
    I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward to checking out your web page yet again.

  25. wonderful submit, very informative. I’m wondering why the
    other experts of this sector don’t realize this. You must proceed your writing.
    I am confident, you’ve a great readers’ base already!

  26. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great.

    I don’t know who you are but definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you are not already ;
    ) Cheers!

  27. Hey There. I discovered your blog using msn. This is a really well written article.

    I’ll make sure to bookmark it and come back to read extra of your helpful info.

    Thank you for the post. I’ll certainly return.

  28. Wow, this article is fastidious, my younger sister is analyzing these
    things, thus I am going to convey her.

  29. I really like looking through a post that can make people think.
    Also, thank you for allowing for me to comment!

  30. I visited multiple websites but the audio quality for
    audio songs existing at this web page is in fact excellent.

  31. whoah this weblog is fantastic i really like reading your articles.
    Keep up the great work! You already know, lots of individuals are hunting round
    for this information, you could aid them greatly.

  32. When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time
    a comment is added I get several e-mails with the same comment.

    Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Thanks a lot!

  33. Norberto says:

    When someone writes an article he/she retains the image of a user in his/her mind that how a user can understand it.
    Thus that’s why this paragraph is perfect. Thanks!

  34. I think this is one of the most significant info for me.
    And i am glad reading your article. But want to statement on few general things, The web site taste is ideal,
    the articles is in reality great : D. Just right job, cheers

  35. former chief says:

    What’s up to every one, the contents existing at this website are in fact awesome for people experience, well, keep up the nice work fellows.

  36. Properly, Im ѕurprised you all left tһe veгy additional greatest one for me.?
    Daddy ssaid with a teasing smile. ?It?s that he despatched
    Jesus to die fοr us and give us lifе endlessly and ever and that dᥙe to that we
    are going to be a househ᧐ld in heaven ffor ttens
    of millions of years. That?ѕ fairly good іsnt it?

  37. Natisha says:

    Wow, wonderful blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?
    you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is great,
    as well as the content!

  38. web dating says:

    Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as
    long as I provide credit and sources back to your webpage?
    My blog site is in the exact same area of interest as yours
    and my visitors would truly benefit from a lot of the information you
    present here. Please let me know if this okay with you.
    Appreciate it!

  39. It’s in reality a great and useful piece of information. I’m satisfied that you just shared this useful info with us.

    Please stay us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.

  40. d365wiki.com says:

    If you would like to improve your familiarity simply keep visiting
    this web site and be updated with the most up-to-date news update posted
    here.

  41. I like what you guys tend to be up too. Such clever work and reporting!
    Keep up the very good works guys I’ve included
    you guys to my personal blogroll.

  42. Just wish to say your article is as surprising.
    The clarity in your post is just cool and i could assume you’re
    an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission let
    me to grab your RSS feed to keep updated with forthcoming post.
    Thanks a million and please keep up the enjoyable work.

  43. door edges says:

    With havin so much content do you ever run into any
    issues of plagorism or copyright violation? My website has a lot of unique content I’ve either created myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it up all over the
    web without my permission. Do you know any ways to help stop content from being
    ripped off? I’d definitely appreciate it.

  44. Greetings! I’ve been reading your blog for a while now and finally got the courage to go ahead
    and give you a shout out from Austin Tx!
    Just wanted to tell you keep up the fantastic work!

  45. Today, I went to the beachfront with my kids. I found a
    sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She placed the
    shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.
    She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is totally off topic but I had to tell someone!

  46. Hi there, for all time i used to check website posts here early
    in the daylight, for the reason that i enjoy to find out more and more.

  47. What’s up, after reading this remarkable post i am also
    glad to share my familiarity here with friends.

  48. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your blogs really nice,
    keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back
    down the road. Cheers

  49. I got this web page from my buddy who informed me concerning this website and at
    the moment this time I am browsing this web site and reading very informative content here.

  50. Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?
    you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site is great, as well as the content!

Leave a Reply

*